so let's see. . . you call me ignorant, transphobic, and biased without a shred of evidence. and then decide that a failure to have a constructive discussion is my fault? here is the reality: i initiated a constructive conversation and you responded with invective. real…
My “evidence” for your transphobia is your distinction between “normally gendered” people and “transgendered” people. The proper term for your so-called “normally gendered” individuals is cisgender, and the proper term for trans people is transgender (nix the “-Ed” part in “transgendered”). You are a doctor; if you claim to be so educated, I’d have thought you would know this.
All decisions cease to be constructive when there is discrimination involved. Critiquing my writing, evidence, delivery or even point of view is welcomed, as I do believe it helps me grow as a writer. However, you invalidated yourself when you chose the transphobic route. Again, that has no place on my page.